Page 40 - 2-2017

Хорижий филология. №2, 2017 йил

in the process of speaking. To be more acquisition to one based on holistic
accurate, we accomplish this task by development of competence. There are some
presenting different methods such as group problems which are related especially to the
work, pair work acting role plays, engaging domain of communicative activities in which
them in argumentative class discussions and student exchange messages which the teacher
debates, providing students appropriate films or with each other, and include:
in English origin, giving various presentations - Classroom management is demanding,
to present in front of audience. All these especially with large classes, and teachers
approaches let students develop a set of may fear losing control. Unpredictable
discourse strategies such as opening and communication may take excessive demands
closing a conversation introducing a topic, on the language skills of teachers who
sharing opinions and creating natural English themselves have had limited experience of
speaking environment. Also, students have communicating in English.
the opportunity to interact in different - Pair or group work requires teachers to
situations in different groups and audiences. develop new organizational skills and adopt a
Communication in the classroom was less overtly dominant role in the classroom.
the practical implication for both - In such work, without contrast monitoring
perspectives. But, if we focus only on the students may communicate in the mother
communicative perspective on learning, we tongue or use only minimal English, rather
may draw the conclusion that involvement in than extending their English competence.
communication is sufficient in itself for These conceptions also support the traditional
learning and that we shouldn‘t make any use view of teachers as transmitters of knowledge
at all of traditional techniques such as rather than as facilitators who try to develop
explanations, drills or question- and- answer learner independence. Teachers often face a
practice. This has often been called the contradiction between an official public
‗strong‘ version of communicative policy which advocates CLT and a pencil-
perspective on language, on the other hand, and-paper examination system which tests
still leaves open the possibility that teachers discrete items.
might present and practice individual items in - As a result they often face resistance both
a communicative context before or after from students and from parents, for whom
students use them for communication. This examinations results are understandably of
has often been called the ‗weak‘ point of paramount importance.
communicative language teaching. These and other accounts together
Changes in policy and rhetoric are of with experiences such as those mentioned in
course easy to formulate, but the practical the previous section, indicate that as a ready-
changes which they entail are often more made package of ideas and classroom
problematic. Within a short period, teachers techniques which applied anywhere, CLT has
have been expected to develop new practical now experienced the same fate as the
skills for classroom teaching change how they proclaimed ‗best methods‘ of the past.
evaluate students, develop the ability to adopt However, it still provides a conceptual
textbooks, use modern technology and framework centered on the need to orient our
improve their own language proficiency. To teaching toward learners communicative goals
implement these new practical demands, they to design meaningful experiences which lead
have had to make major changes in attitude toward these goals. Also the specific ideas
and approach: to change their conceptions of techniques that it has generated have enriched
their own role from that of a transmitter of the repertoire that teachers can draw as they
knowledge to that of a multirole educator and develop their own context sensitive pedagogy.
to change their conception of language
learning from one based on knowledge

39