Page 70 - 3-son 2018 yil

Хорижий филология №3, 2018 йил

and finishes unsuccessfully). Because until print(word[0:k])
the end of the word we cannot find a word in word=word[k:]
database similar the word which we cut. If we if(len(word)>10):
start cutting a letters from the beginning of k=10
the word, the same problem can be faced else:
anyway. k=len(word)
Next, another idea is using contains
method of the programming. To do this: we elif(qoshimchalarOt.__contains
identify a length of the word; select words __(word[0:k])):
from the database that have less length than print(word[0:k])
the words‘; search all words in the component word = word[k:]
of the word; if not found then decreasing the if (len(word) > 10):
length of selected words and repeating the k = 10
process until getting to success. However, in else:
this case we have more and more k = len(word)
combinations. RESULT: BOLAJONLARIMGAMI
Despite these problems above if we get (to my dear children?)
a base using some methods, we can identify a bola
type part of speech of the base. But, parsing jon
all appendixes is also not easy. As our lar
approach to morphological analyzing from im
left to right is appropriate for Uzbek ga
language. Firstly, stem is taken according to mi
parts of speech database, then identifying Conclusion
Taking example of some lexeme and As we showed above the model of
wordforms we obtained like this algorithm by morphotactic of Uzbek is crucial for analysis.
python. Uzbek verbs have grammatical categories
k=1 which are should be clarified stage of
for i in range(0, len(word)): segmentation each of them. Segmentation of
if(otlar.__contains__(word[0: i+1])): morphological parsing is multilevel process,
k=i+1 so there are a number of notable approaches
print(word[0: k]) in the world. Each grammatical and
word=word[k:] orthographical rules are important for finite
k=10 state transducer. The current article presents
while(len(word)>0): some ways to resolve morphoanalyzer issue
for machine translation.
if(qoshOtYas.__contains__(word[0:k]))
:

References:
1. Jurafskiy D. Speech and language processing. 2007. – P. 4.
2. Mitkov R. The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics. -P. 62.
3. Cyril Goutte, Nicola Cancedda, Marc Dymetman, and George Foster Learning Machine
Translation Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 2009. - P.6.
4. Raül Canals, Anna Esteve, Alicia Garrido et.al., interNOSTRUM: A Spanish Catalan
Machine Translation System, Machine Translation Review, Issue No. 11, December (2000) –PP.
21-25.
5. Krister Lindén, Miikka Silfverberg, and Tommi Pirinen HFST Tools for Morphology – An
Efficient Open-Source.

69