Page 92 - 1-2018
P. 92
Хорижий филология. №1, 2018 йил
ikkovi katta bo'ldi. Boysari boy edi, Boybo'ri and literary poet of the school of
esa shoy edi, bul ikkovi ham farzandsiz Kurgangscha. We have written about this in
bo'ldi.‖ (Alpomish, 15-bet). Qo'ng'irot, our work pointing that "Kuntugmish",
Dobonbiy, Alpinbiy, Boybo'ri, Boysari- these "Alpomish", "Holdorkhon" are used in the
names are understandable till nowadays for language of poems. We have made some
us. comments on the phraseological units,
2. Names which are not used nowadays, because poets Ergash and Fazil are different
and their meaning are not clear for us. It from others by the number and scale of their
means that such kind of names is not used and creative repertoire, artistic elasticity,
their meaning is not accessible. For instance: originality of style.
Qalmoqshohning Tovka degan qizi bor edi. As you know, any phrase varies from
(254-bet). Alpomish aytdi: — o'g'rining piri one language into another, with a number of
hazrati Joltong deguchi edi, hazrati Joltonga specific features. Hence, the specific features
sirina qolgin (264-bet). of the words are inherent to the phrases, and
Tovka, Joltong are not used, even, the to the nature of all types of phraseological
meaning of them is not illustrious. units. That is why they are the language and
It should be admitted that the name of speech phenomena. Studying such features
women are widely used in this poem. also has its own history in Uzbek
Barchinoy, Qaldirg`och, Tovka, Suqsuroy, phraseology. The investigations of Uzbek
Surxayl and etc. Most of the names of the scholars such as Sh.Rahmatullaev,
women transfer their quality and beauty. A.Mamatov, B. Yuldoshov, and Uzbek
Toponymes (the name of places), are literary critics play an important role in Uzbek
used frequently in our legendary poem: linguistics (4,101).
Angliya, Astrobot, Belgiya, Bongola, A number of significant works have
Guruziya, Qo`ng`irot, Akdashman, Arab, been done in the field of Uzbek phraseology.
Arabxona, Bo`ka, Do`rmon, Kenagas, Nevertheless, it is desirable to include the
Ko`rkat, Naymancha, Neko`z, Sarmug`ul, dialectal phraseological units used in the
Saroy, Xo`ja Tohir, Shakar ovul, Qalmoq eli, Uzbek folk epics as well. The collection and
Qatag`on, Qiyot, Qovunchi etc. characterization of phraseological units in the
Azamat bosh berar dinning yo'liga, artistic language of Uzbek people will have a
Turarim yo'q Boysun-Qo'ng'irot eliga profound impact on the enrichment of
(23-bet). lexicology and phraseology of the Uzbek
Among proper nouns, we can encounter language, with great scientific and practical
lots of names associated with the animals‘ skills. This is because of the history and
names (zoonyms) such as the names of birds, traditions of Uzbek people, their lifestyle, and
horses, snakes and others. For example, their mother tongue. Of course, poems are
Boychibor (a horse), Semurg (a bird), Musna formed as a result of verbal art, and they are
(a snake), ajdar (dragon) are used in our saga. influenced by certain dialects because they
The folk epics of Uzbekistan are have been created by a group of people from
reflected in centuries-old living conditions of that area. The folk epics of Uzbek, which we
the Uzbek people and original phraseological have learned as the object of our analysis, and
units. Speaking of the legendary folk they have been written by representatives of
musicians, who have been inherited from the Kipchak language. However, as a result of
generation to generation, have been decorated this or that epic for centuries, from one region
with their decent work, and with the help of to another for various reasons, the plots and
their talent, the talent of the audience, they expressions became not typical to the
sang. It helped to smooth and poetize the Kipchak dialect in the depiction of events.
poet's language. Observations show that every In the folklore of Uzbek people, which
principal school had a method of singing. In we have analyzed, the color of dialectal
particular, Ergash Jumanbulbul ugli has a phrazalogical units is structurally different.
great literary heritage as a great representative
91