Page 38 - 1-2016
P. 38
Хорижий филология. №1, 2016 йил
Second, due to the long history of Therefore, the following suggestions are
examination-oriented teaching methodology made to do the work.
in China, most students are highly driven by First, hierarchal teaching is quite
passing tests instead of mastering and using necessary although we are totally aware of its
the knowledge with a vague understanding of deficiency. We could divide the students into
the importance of English in their future three levels, and each level has its
career. Meanwhile, failures from corresponding teaching schedules, steps
examinations can easily lead to anxiety and textbooks and specially-designed activities.
frustration. The division could be based on the results of
Third, results of Entrance Entrance Examination and our entrance exam.
Examination (a nationwide and standard test After all, we should teach students in
in China) always show wild inconsistencies accordance of their aptitude.
among students enrolled in vocational Second, we should provide more
schools, which is rare in other colleges and opportunities for students to use English,
universities in China. Take students enrolled both in classroom and after class. According
in Nantong Institute of Technology in 2014 to our previous research, free-style speech is
for example, of all the 1194 students, the highly effective. Students could choose their
highest score in English is 84 while the interested topics, collect information, work
lowest is only 35. Therefore, college English on their paper and finally make the
teaching becomes especially difficult due to performance. When making their speech,
the great differences. they should also answer all the questions
Last but not least, most Chinese related to the content raised by students and
students are more willing to listen, read and teachers. The whole process perfectly
write than to speak. Therefore, after years of illustrates input-taking in-output. Besides,
preparation, in the school year 2013-2014, group discussion and role-play, together with
we chose one class to do the experimental annual national writing competition and
teaching. We tried so many methods to speaking competition, are also proved to be
encourage students to talk that we even threw able to bring the same effect.
the textbooks and tests away. Our attempt Third, after class, ―Second Classroom‖
was proved to be quite successful in students‘ activities could be taken into consideration.
willingness to talk. However, we neglected ―Second Classroom‖ activities should be
that input was as important as output. related to students‘ majors and hobbies. For
Without enough input students can only example, Automobile Marketing majors
repeatedly use structures and words they could go to sell cars to foreigners in 4S shops;
already know instead of using new phrases Tourism majors could work as guides for
and expressions. Besides, without sufficient foreigners in travel agencies, and etc. These
exercises, students made handful of mistakes activities are more acceptable for students for
in reading and writing. their practicability, participation and
3. Application of Input Hypothesis enjoyment. Of course, the organization of
and Output Hypothesis in College English these activities should be under careful
Based on the analysis of advantages schedule and preparation.
and disadvantages of Input Hypothesis and 4. Experimental Teaching
Output Hypothesis and current problems in To test if the above statements are
college English teaching, we find out that effective, we make the following
listening and reading is as important as experimental teaching.
speaking and writing. Only a balance 4.1 Subjects
between input and output can be proved to be We choose the freshmen from Class
efficient in teaching. Input and output from 1401 (39 students), 1402 (40 students) and
classroom teaching is far from enough. Class 1404 (38 students) of Business
37
