Page 54 - 2-2016

Хорижий филология. №2, 2016 йил

METAPHOR IN NEWSPAPER DISCOURSE IN THE LIGHT OF
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS AND LINGUOCULTUROLOGY

Khojeev Andrey,
Associate Lecturer of Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Key words: conceptual/cognitive metaphor, source domain, target domain, politic discourse,
economic discourse, concept, conceptsphere, Cognitive Linguistics, Linguoculturology

Having shifted the structural paradigm, The second approach has initially been
the anthropocentric one has enabled to carry put forth by American linguists G. Lakoff
outcomplex investigationsstudying language and M. Johnson in their work “Metaphors We
from different angles, from the perspective of Live By”. Having introduced the notion of
the human and his activities. In other words, conceptual metaphor theyhighlighted that it is
the linguistic means arestudied on the basis of “pervasive in everyday life, not just in
the assumptions of the modern trends such as language, but in thought and action. Our
Psycholinguistics, Discourse Analysis, ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which
Linguocognitive and Linguocultural Studies. we both think and act, is fundamentally
Thus, the present article is aimed at revealing metaphorical in nature” [Lakoff, Jonson 1980:
metaphors in newspaper discourse and their 4]. In this way, we enlarge our conceptual
classification in the light of Cognitive system by acquiring the concepts through the
linguistics and Linguoculturology. conceptual metaphor. Thus, conceptual
Referring to the different scholars, we metaphor enabled scholars to study it not only
can outline the following interpretation of as a stylistic device, but also as a phenomenon
Linguoculturology: it is a complex and through which language and cognition are
interdisciplinary study of the linguistic means interrelated.
which embody cultural and ethnical According to the theoryconceptual
specificity. Cultural specificity and ethnic metaphor is the cognitive process between
peculiarities are reflected both linguistically two frames (structures of knowledge) – the
in the notional component of language unit source domain and the target domain. The
and non-linguistically through its deep source domain is the structure of already
semantics. In this way, Linguoculturology is acquired notions whereas the target domain
the discipline which by the use of systematic represents the new concepts that are going to
methods investigates the language units be acquired. The acquisition of new concepts
(linguoculturemes) that embody store and is realized through metaphorical mapping that
transfer cultureand are usually revealed in transfers some of the elements from the
discourse. [Ashurova 2012, Воробьев 2006, source domain to the target domain. In other
Красных 2002, Телия 1999] words, the source domain serves as a
Among all types of culturally specific basement for the target domain, i.e. the new
means, however,metaphor is of paramount knowledge is acquired in comparison with the
importance. It is worth noting, that there are old one. As a matter of fact, some of the
two approaches to its investigation: metaphor elements, and consequently some of the
as a linguistic mechanism, and metaphor as a features, of the source and target domain
cognitive principle. The first mentioned implicitly coincide with each other. This
approach presumes metaphor as a stylistic coincidence was termed as invariance.
(rhetoric) device that is used for achieving The assumption about the cognitive
poetic imagination and consequently making nature of metaphor and its cultural value goes
an aesthetic impact on the readers. In this case back to the Aristotle‟s times; the philosopher
metaphor is the property of the language. claimed that metaphor is a conversion of the
53