Page 57 - 2-2016
P. 57

Хорижий филология.  №2, 2016 йил




            stock  market.  Finally,  the  last  expression     expressions  „heart  of  economy‟,  „markets‟
            „booms in share prices‟ is of the orientational     nerve‟,  „backbone  of  the  economy‟  denote
            type –BOOM IS UP.                                   „vital  part  of  economy‟  ,  „the  most  sensitive
                   However,  some  of  the  metaphorical        part  of  the  market‟,  „a  support  for  the
            expressions  in  theeconomic  context  are          economy‟    reflect  the  structure  of  economic
            unique.  They  are  created  to  form  a  certain   system  forming  the  target  domain  THE
            concept  in  the  conceptual  frame  of  the        STRUCTURE  OF  ECONOMIC  SYSTEM
            addressee; therefore, they tend to be of a high     and  the  source  domain  THE  STRUCTURE
            sense  of  imagination.    The  next  examples      OF  PHYSICAL  BODY.  Finally,  in  the  last
            demonstrate it:                                     two  examples  the  expressions  „remedy  for
                a.  Vodafone boosted by weak pound but          economy‟  and  „headache  for  economy‟  refer
                    struggling in mature markets                to  the  human‟s  state  forming  the  target
                b.  Obama puts housing at the heart of          domain  THE  CONDITION  OF  ECONOMY
                    economy                                     and the source domain THE CONDITION OF
                c.   Markets’ nerve on fears of end to          THE HUMAN ORGANISM.
                    quantitative easing                                Thus, in the article we have examined
                d.  […]There is still a great need to           metaphor which is not only a stylistic device
                    address the plight of Kenya‟s poor          but  also  a  complex  cognitive  process  for
                    people, as agriculture remains the          cognizing  the  world  and  designating  new
                    backbone of the economy. […]                concepts.  It  has been found that metaphor is
                e.  Europe: Zapatero tries urgent remedy        closely  connected  with  culture  as  a  tool
                    for Spain's economy                         serving  for  widening  the  conceptual  world
                f.  A growing headachefor the Chinese           picture.  The  conceptual  metaphorisation  in
                    economy                                     newspaper discourse is a two- fold process. It,
            In  the  examples  listed  above  the  ontological   on  the  one  hand,  is  used  to  invoke  certain
            metaphor  –ECONOMY  IS  A  HUMAN                    concepts  in  the  readers‟  conceptual  frame,
            BEING was used. Thus, in the first example          while,  on  the  other,    is  used  as  the  form  of
            the  expression  „mature  market‟  denotes          unique  expressions  aiming  at  creating  new
            „developed  market‟,  that  conceptually  links     concepts  and  images  for  the  sake  of
            them  to  the  milestone  in  human  life  process   provoking  certain  pragmatic  effect.  Having
            consequently  forming  the  target  domain          charged  pragmatically,  conceptual  metaphor,
            STAGES OF ECONOMIC SYSTEM and the                   as  a  result,  is  of  frequent  usage  in  politic,
            source  domain  STAGES  OF  HUMAN                   social and economic content.
            BEING.  In  the  next  three  examples  the
                                                          References
                1.  Аристотель Поэтика.  Пер.  Н. И. Новосадского. «Классики  искусства».  Вып.  1.  –
                    Ленинград: Академия, 1927. – C.120;
                2.  Балли Ш. Французская стилистика.  Перевод с французского.  – Москва: Издательство
                    иностранной  литературы, 1961. – C.394;
                3.  Будаев Э.В. Чудинов А.П. Метафора в политической коммуникации. Монография. –
                    Москва: Флинта/Наука, 2008. – C.248;
                4.  Воробьев  В.В.  Лингвокультурология.  –  Москва:  Издательство  Российского
                    Университета Дружбы Народов, 2006.;
                5.  Красных  В.В.  Этнопсихолингвистика  и  Лингвокультурология.  –  Москва:  Гнозис,
                    2002.;
                6.  Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология. – Москва: «Академия», 2001. –C.198;
                7.  Телия  В.Н.  Первоочередные  задачи    и  методологические  проблемы  исследования
                    фразеологического состава языка в контексте культуры. – Москва, 1999.;
                8.   Ashurova D.U. Text linguistics. – Tashkent: Taffakur qanoti, 2012. – p.116;
                                                           56
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62