Page 107 - 2-son-2018-yil

Хорижий филология
COGNITIVE THEORY OF METAPHOR
Sapayeva Sokhiba,
Teacher of USWLU
Key words: metaphor, cognitive metaphor, concepts, conceptual metaphor, cultural
experience, comparison and categorization.
The study of metaphor originated from
ancient Greece, basically Aristotle, who
looked at metaphor as implicit comparison
which is centered at analogy [1,3]. Aristotle
suggested that the main function of metaphor
is stylistic and ornamental [2,79]. Metaphor is
used for artistic reasons, mainly in poetry, to
definite a thought in an eloquent style.
Aristotle also pointed out the believable
function of metaphor, seeing it as an active
rhetorical figure to be employed in political
discourse [2, 80].
His opinion of metaphor develops the
basis of the so-called comparison theory of
metaphor. This advance sees metaphor as “a
type of comparison, a shortened simile”
established on likeness [2, 90]. Therefore, let
us consider these metaphors: You are the light
in my life is observed as a reduced variety of:
You bring happiness to my life.
The downside of the viewpoint is that it
disregards the significant difference between
a comparison and a categorization: whereas a
simile stresses probable likenesses between
two conceptions, a metaphor creates the two
concepts as having “in common something
more than modest similarities in that they
belong to the same class sharing pertinent
features” [4, 135]. Furthermore, the
comparison theory realizes metaphor as
comparing two concepts, which have been
seen as similar by the author prior to the use
of metaphor, somewhat making the
likenesses. This one suggests that metaphor is
narrowed to phenomena deep-rooted in actual
or possible experience [4, 90]. The second
main theory is the substitution theory of
metaphor. This approach says “metaphor is a
way of saying what may perhaps be supposed
accurately” [4, 90]. One can exchanges
metaphor with a synonymous expression. As
a consequence, the metaphor: He trumpeted
106
№2, 2018 йил
out the news can be replaced by: He told to
anyone who wanted to listen [3, 15].
Max Black initiated the next approach
of metaphor in the second half of the
twentieth century called the interaction
theory. Comparing the two theories above, it
does not need metaphor as simply
maintaining symbolically something.
Metaphor contains the principal and
subsidiary subjects, conforming to the
metaphorical emphasis and the adjoining
literal frame in turn.
According to G.Lakoff, “the creator of a
metaphorical statement selects, emphasizes,
suppresses, and organizes features of the
primary subject by applying to it statements
isomorphic with the members of the
secondary subject’s implicative complex” [4,
29]. This approach suggests that the
interaction theory does not assume it is only
the lesser issue, which has influence on the
main subject. For example, in the metaphor
‘man is a wolf’, we have enough knowledge
and connotations about a man and wolves,
e.g., knowing that they are wild and ruthless
[2, 95]. Vitally, the interaction theory does
not mean metaphor only as a matter of
language but also shows its cognitive
measurement. The three theories does not
have much currency in modern investigation
on metaphor, which mainly uses the cognitive
theory of metaphor.
A conceptual metaphor, that is,
cognitive metaphor, is considered one of the
basic mental processes, a way of cognizing,
structuring and explaining the world around
us; the connection of knowledge about one
conceptual area in another conceptual area.
Remains of the experience are formed and
reproduced in a particular cultural society.
The formulation of the question of the
conceptual metaphor gave impetus to research
in the sphere of human thought processes.