Page 34 - 4-2016
P. 34
Хорижий филология. №4, 2016 йил
daytime strength”, “bird cried‖. As it is the afternoon sun, knowing her own clownish
widely known, personification is a stylistic clumsiness and lack of suavity, in
device in which a thing, an idea or an animal comparison.” (D.H. Lawrence “The Lovely
is given human attributes. In other words, Lady”, p.13)
inanimate objects acquire the quality of living The fragment describes the situation
creature. Besides conveying LP‘s where Cecilia accidentally gets to hear her
psychological and emotional state in a aunt Paulina‘s talking to herself in Italian and
impressive way, personification, also finds about her past wrong deeds. Here the
influences the addressee‘s emotional state important is the role of represented speech
thereby stimulating his/her brain activity in which the author conveys through the
the process of emotional perception. In thoughts of Cecilia. In other words, the author
addition, this fragment is characterized by a reveals Paulina‘s personality characteristics
high degree of stylistic effect due to the through the unuttered speech of Cecilia. A
abundance of other stylistically marked units peculiar feature of the emotiveness of the
such as epithet (moon had just risen, very fragment is not separate use of emotionally
golden; scentless beauty of that moment; colored units, but their convergence that
powerful spirit), polysyndeton (and… and creates emotive density of the text.
….), asyndeton (One bird, he could not tell Particularly, a significant role in creating
what, cried "Pip-pip," "Pip-pip," with perfect emotiveness is assigned to the use of
monotony; he could hear a night-Jar spinning numerous genuine epithets, which create
very far off; an owl hooting), simile (like a subjective evaluation: ―Softly, whisperingly,
bright, powerful, watching spirit; as if a with infinite caressiveness and yet with that
million white moths or spirits had floated in), subtle, insidious arrogance under its velvet,
hyperbole (innumerable flowers; a million came the voice‖, ―poisonous charm of the
white moths or spirits), onomatopoeia ("Pip- voice, so caressive, so soft and flexible, yet so
pip"; burbling…chuckle). utterly egoistic”, “so delicate, so subtle and
Very often emotiveness is embodied in flexible and beautifully controlled”,
the speech of LP, especially when s/he is “clownish clumsiness”; antithesis: “flexible
under the influence of the flow of emotions – clumsy”, “caressiveness - arrogance”;
and this kind of speech tends to bring out the oxymoron: “poisonous charm”” various
inner feelings and thoughts of the LP: types of repetitions: “so…so…”, “Why,
―Caro, caro, tu non l’haivisto!” it was why..”, “and … and”; contextual synonymic
murmuring away, in a language Cecilia did repetitions: “whisperingly”, “softly”,
not understand. She lay and writhed her limbs “murmuring”, “caressive”, “beautifully”,
in the sun, listening intently to words she “delicate”, “flexible” (voice) ; barbarisms:
could not follow. Softly, whisperingly, with “Bravo”.
infinite caressiveness and yet with that The another extract from the same
subtle, insidious arrogance under its velvet, story is embodied with emotiveness by
came the voice, murmuring in Italian: various stylistically marked units:
“Bravo, si, molto bravo, poverino, ma uomo There was dead silence. Poor Cecilia
come te non saràmai, mai, mai!” Oh, lay with all the use gone out of her. Andthere
especially in Italian Cecilia heard the was dead silence. Till at last came the
poisonous charm of the voice, so caressive, whisper:
so soft and flexible, yet so utterly egoistic. “I didn’t kill Henry. No, no! No, no!
She hated it with intensity as it sighed and Henry, surely you can’t blame me! I loved
whispered out of nowhere. Why, why should you, dearest; I only wanted to help you.”
it be so delicate, so subtle and flexible and “You killed me!” came the deep,
beautifully controlled, when she herself was artificial, accusing voice. “Now let Robert
so clumsy? Oh, poor Cecilia, she writhed in live. Let him go! Let him marry!”
33
