Page 91 - 4-сон 2018 йил

Хорижий филология №4, 2018 йил

English and Russian languages belongs to Despite the above differences, it
different structural types of fields. In English, should be noted that in both English and
this is a monocentric type field based on the Russian, the quantitative category is
grammatical category of a number, while in represented by multilevel language tools -
Russian it is a polycentric field that relies not morphological, lexical, word-formative,
only on the grammatical category of a number syntactic and phonetic. In both languages, this
but also on the lexical-grammatical class of phenomenon breaks down into two micro
numerals, as well as on the quantitative- fields - the micro field of unity and the micro
nominal combinations [3, 194]. field of multiplicity; however, the distribution
Therefore in the English language the of constituents within each micro field in the
core of the quantitative field is represented by languages being compared is different.
the grammatical category of the number; Thus, our analysis proves that the
derivational, phonetic, lexical and syntactic quantitative category is a linguistic
means are peripheral. In the Russian universality that is inherent in all levels of
language, lexical means also belong to the both English and Russian. Different-level
nuclear, in addition to the grammatical means of expression form a category of
category of the number; word-formation, quantitative, the constituents of which, due to
phonetic and syntactic means constitute a their large number, are widely represented in
peripheral zone [4, 66]. the texts of fiction.

The list of used literature:
1. Арустамян Л.Л. Словообразовательная система и деривационные связи
наименований поля количества. // Вопросы русского и общего языкознания. – Самарканд:
СамГУ, 1994. – С. 71-73.
2. Берман И.М. Грамматика английского языка. - Москва: Высшая школа, 1994. – 321
с.
3. Качалова К.Н., Израилевич Е.Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка. -
Кыргызский филиал Калифорнийской Международной Академии Наук, 2001. – 487 с.
4. Ariel Mira. Referring and accessibility. // Journal of Linguistics, 2003. – № 24(1). – Р.
65–87.

Асадова Ч. Семантика категории количества в английском и русском языках.
Статья посвящается проблеме семантической категории количества в английском и
русском языках. Автор анализирует случаи несовпадения количественной семантики в
исследуемых языках.
Асадова Ч. Инглиз ва рус тилларида миқдор категориясининг семантикаси. Мақола
инглиз ва рус тилларидамиқдор категориясининг семантикаси муаммосига бағишланган.
Муаллиф икки тилда миқдор семантикасининг номуқобиллик томонларини аниқлаб берган.

90